<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/8980944255902395412?origin\x3dhttp://br3ndan.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Film

After a couple of weeks of toying around with film.. I must say, I can't help but feel disappointed.

Maybe it's too soon to say so, or maybe I'm just not familiar enough with film. But its main benefits - much better highlights and larger print size - just do not justify its clumsiness, its higher risk factor for accidentally ruined shots, and development costs.

It takes a trained eye to see the difference between film and digital. It looks slightly different.. but we're getting more and more used to seeing the smooth, fresh colors of digital that I think very soon film will be restricted to just the area of fine art.

But.. oh well, maybe I just haven't experimented enough yet.

But the costs of experimenting with film is scary. It goes in chucks of $20.. for film, and developing.

I'm starting to develop a phobia of it.

You can leave your response or bookmark this post to del.icio.us by using the links below.
Comment | Bookmark | Go to end